Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review explores S1P's influence on T-cell responses in solid cancer, highlighting therapeutic potentials.
Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) using tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has achieved clinically and biologically relevant responses in patients with solid cancer. Clinical efficacy has been increasingly linked to a specific T-cell phenotype, particularly CD8+ TILs exhibiting a progenitor stem-cell-like profile (CD39− CD69−). This review explores the critical role of the sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) axis in orchestrating these responses. We detail the biological antagonism between the activation marker CD69 and S1P receptor 1 (S1PR1), where mutual exclusivity dictates thymic selection, if T-cells are retained in tissues or allowed to recirculate and maintain long-term immune surveillance. The S1PR1:S1P axis is further recognized as a critical regulator of mitochondrial fitness, sustaining the high energetic demands of precursor T-cells. We examine the “double-edged sword” nature of S1P in the tumor microenvironment (TME), where it can drive pro-tumorigenic processes like angiogenesis and vascular mimicry (VM), be hijacked by cancer cells to create immune-excluded environments, or S1P can increase T-cell fitness. We summarize the current landscape of clinical trials (as of January 2026) that target S1P production or signaling to modulate anti-tumor responses or use S1P as a biologically relevant marker of treatment outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
António et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: