Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analytic derivation demonstrates closed-form constants and asymptotic betweenness in circulant graphs, implying new theoretical insights.
This paper presents the analytic core of the Quantum Language and Consciousness Model (QLCM), isolating the closed-form derivations that emerge from the spectral topology of the circulant graph C_N(1,3). The central results are: 1. Asymptotic Betweenness Signature: The normalized average betweenness centrality of the QLCM 4-regular circulant graph converges exactly to B_∞ = 1/12 in the limit N → ∞. This value is derived analytically from the vertex-transitivity of C_N(1,3) under the cyclic group Z_N and the sectorial geometry of shortest paths in the lifted 2D lattice. 2. Closed-Form Constant K: The normalization constant K ≈ 19.29 is proven algebraically closed via K = 2·E_f / B_∞ = 24·E_f, requiring no empirical tuning. With the QLCM invariant E_f = 0.8037, this yields K = 19.2888. 3. Information Bottleneck on the Flat Torus: The invariant E_f = 0.8037 is identified as the optimal projection eigenvalue of the Information Bottleneck functional on the discretized flat torus T² = S¹ × S¹ (curvature K̄ = 0), where the 12-sector partition of the phase space imposes the 80/20 trade-off as a geometric theorem. 4. Topological Prediction Class: A falsifiable framework predicting how optimal projection fidelity E_f varies with the Euler characteristic and curvature of the underlying manifold. All derivations are self-contained within the QLCM framework: operators on finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, spectral graph theory, and discrete harmonic analysis on circulant graphs. No external geometric hypotheses, physical membrane models, or third-party theoretical constructs are invoked. This work is registered as independent intellectual property of the QLCM framework created by Osmary Lisbeth Navarro Tovar (Ashira), Laboratorio CCUANTICA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Osmary Lisbeth Navarro Tovar (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: