Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review analyzes polymer performance in hydrogen energy, highlighting trade-offs in reliability and stability.
Hydrogen energy systems rely extensively on polymeric materials for storage, sealing, transport, and tribological applications; however, their long-term reliability is strongly influenced by hydrogen–polymer interactions. This review presents a comparative analysis of polymers with and without hydrogen bonding, focusing on how molecular architecture governs hydrogen compatibility, transport behavior, and degradation mechanisms under high-pressure environments. Hydrogen-bonded polymers, such as polyamides, polyurethanes (PU), and polyimides, exhibit high mechanical strength and thermal stability due to strong intermolecular interactions but are susceptible to hydrogen-assisted chemical degradation and embrittlement. In contrast, non-hydrogen-bonded polymers, including polyethylene, polypropylene (PP), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), and Polyether ether ketone (PEEK), demonstrate excellent chemical inertness and low hydrogen reactivity, yet experience diffusion-driven damage such as blistering and fatigue softening. This study establishes a unified framework linking molecular structure, hydrogen transport, and failure mechanisms, revealing a fundamental trade-off between mechanical integrity and chemical stability. Advanced strategies, including polymer blending, nanofiller reinforcement, and multilayer composites, are proposed to optimize durability, permeability, and overall hydrogen compatibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaiser et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: