Key result
Positive genotype in arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy is linked to an ~8-fold higher recurrence risk.
Why the study?
Arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy develops unpredictably in atrial fibrillation with marked variability in severity and recurrence, but whether genetic susceptibility contributes to this heterogeneity remains uncertain.
Does the presence of deleterious variants in cardiomyopathy-associated genes predict greater clinical severity and recurrence risk in patients with arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy?
Cohort (n=100)
Yes
Does the presence of deleterious variants in cardiomyopathy-associated genes predict greater clinical severity and recurrence risk in patients with arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy?
In patients with arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy, pathogenic genetic variants (especially TTN truncating variants) are present in 16% and are associated with more severe disease and higher recurrence risk.
May identify higher-risk arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy patients; hypothesis-generating for genotype-guided management.
Background Arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy develops unpredictably in a subset of patients with atrial fibrillation, with marked interindividual variability in severity and recurrence risk. Whether genetic susceptibility contributes to this heterogeneity remains uncertain. Objectives To determine the prevalence and clinical impact of deleterious variants in cardiomyopathy-associated genes among patients with arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy. Methods In this retrospective, multicenter study, patients with arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy underwent genetic testing targeting cardiomyopathy-associated genes. Individuals carrying pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were classified as genotype-positive. Baseline characteristics, clinical severity and follow-up outcomes were compared between genotype-positive and genotype-negative patients. Results In 100 patients (mean age 59.9±11.1 years, 18% women, baseline left ventricular ejection fraction 28.2±7.3%), 16 (16%) were genotype-positive, with TTN truncating variants accounting for 75% of variants. Compared with genotype-negative individuals, genotype-positive patients more frequently had a family history of cardiomyopathy (31.2% vs 4.8%, p=0.005) and sudden death (25% vs 6%, p=0.034), presented with more severe disease -including lower ejection fraction (24.6% vs 28.8%, p=0.034) and higher incidence of cardiogenic shock (25% vs 3.6%, p=0.012)- and exhibited a higher risk of recurrence (18.8% vs 2.4%, p=0.028). Conclusions Arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy patients exhibit a substantial prevalence of deleterious variants in cardiomyopathy-associated genes, particularly TTN truncating variants. Genotype-positive individuals represent a high-risk subgroup with greater familial burden, more severe clinical presentation and increased recurrence risk. Genetic testing may identify at-risk patients, refine prognostic stratification and guide therapy and follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tirón et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy (n=100). Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in cardiomyopathy-associated genes (Genotype-positive) vs. Genotype-negative was evaluated on Recurrence risk (p=0.028). Genotype-positive patients with arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy exhibited a significantly higher risk of recurrence compared to genotype-negative patients (18.8% vs 2.4%, p=0.028).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: