Key result
Nacubactam monotherapy causes no clinically relevant QTcF prolongation compared to placebo.
Why the study?
Early-phase studies of nacubactam monotherapy were not powered to assess proarrhythmic risk, prompting a pooled analysis to quantify potential effects on cardiac repolarization.
Does nacubactam monotherapy prolong the QTc interval in healthy adults?
RCT
Does nacubactam monotherapy prolong the QTc interval in healthy adults?
Nacubactam does not cause clinically significant QTc prolongation at relevant exposure levels, supporting its progression to multidose trials without a dedicated thorough QT study.
Supports advancing nacubactam to patient trials without QT precautions; extends cardiac safety data from healthy volunteer RCTs.
Nacubactam is a β-lactamase inhibitor. Early-phase studies with 1000/2000/4000/8000 mg nacubactam monotherapy were not powered to assess proarrhythmic risk. Therefore, this analysis pooled electrocardiogram data from two placebo-controlled studies to quantify potential effects of nacubactam on cardiac repolarization. The primary endpoint was ΔQTcF, denoting the time-matched change in QT interval corrected for heart rate. The primary estimand was mean ΔΔQTcF (placebo-corrected ΔQTcF) in healthy adults at double the maximum clinically relevant exposure levels of nacubactam/metabolites. Mixed models for repeated measures and concentration-QTc modeling were used to analyze ΔQTcF. From Mixed models for repeated measures, most 90% confidence intervals for ΔΔQTcF fell below 10 ms, but there were some inconsistencies at 3 h after 1000/2000 mg doses, where 90% confidence intervals straddled 10 ms. However, after 4000/8000 mg doses, 90% confidence intervals fell below 10 ms, with no trend of increasing QTcF prolongation with increasing dose in pooled or individual study data. Moreover, from concentration-QTc modeling, 90% confidence intervals for ΔΔQTcF were below 10 ms for maximum clinically relevant exposure levels, with no evidence of concentration-dependent effects. Results from concentration-QTc modeling fell below the safety margin of 10 ms at relevant analyte levels. While certain confidence intervals from Mixed models for repeated measures straddled 10 ms at 3 h after 1000/2000 mg doses, these inconsistencies were not sustained and not evident at higher doses. Overall, findings support the safety of nacubactam and justify evaluation in larger, multidose, combination-therapy studies and provide regulatory-relevant evidence supporting progression to multidose and combination therapy trials without the need for a dedicated thorough QT study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morita et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Healthy adults. Nacubactam vs. Placebo was evaluated on mean ΔΔQTcF (placebo-corrected time-matched change in QT interval corrected for heart rate). Nacubactam monotherapy (up to 8000 mg) did not cause clinically relevant QTcF prolongation, as 90% confidence intervals for placebo-corrected ΔQTcF fell below the 10 ms safety margin.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: