Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates tooth-level barreling effects on transmission error in gear pairs, implying simulation adjustments for better design.
Transmission error (TE) is a major excitation source in geared systems, but microgeometry deviations are usually evaluated through nominal amplitudes rather than their tooth-to-tooth spatial distribution. This study investigates how different tooth-level barreling deviation patterns influence TE modulation and spectral characteristics in a controlled single helical gear-pair model. The nominal barreling value was kept constant, while four deviation patterns were imposed on the 23-tooth pinion: harmonic, phase-shifted harmonic, clustered with an outlier, and random. The TE response was evaluated in the time domain and by Fast Fourier Transform (FFT)-based spectral analysis, with particular attention to the gear mesh frequency (GMF) and shaft-frequency-spaced sidebands. The results show that identical nominal barreling levels can produce different TE waveforms and spectral signatures. Harmonic distributions mainly preserve a regular response, whereas phase-shifted and clustered patterns increase waveform asymmetry and sideband activity. The clustered outlier case produced the most fault-like response. The findings indicate that tooth-level spatial distribution should be considered explicitly in simulation-based gear microgeometry and noise, vibration, and harshness (NVH) sensitivity studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horvath et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: