Observational analysis reveals increased transmission error from pitch error in gear drives, indicating design optimization needs.
Gear whine noise is governed not only by intentional microgeometry modifications but also by unavoidable pitch (indexing) deviation. This study presents a workflow that couples a tooth-resolved surface scan with a calibrated pitch-deviation table, both imported into a multibody dynamics (MBD) model built in MSC Adams View. Three operating scenarios were evaluated—ideal geometry, measured microgeometry without pitch error, and measured microgeometry with pitch error—at a nominal speed of 1000 r min−1. Time domain analysis shows that integrating the pitch table increases the mean transmission error (TE) by almost an order of magnitude and introduces a distinct 16.66 Hz shaft order tone. When the measured tooth topologies are added, peak-to-peak TE nearly doubles, revealing a non-linear interaction between spacing deviation and local flank shape. Frequency domain results reproduce the expected mesh-frequency side bands, validating the mapping of the pitch table into the solver. The combined method therefore provides a more faithful digital twin for predicting tonal noise and demonstrates why indexing tolerances must be considered alongside profile relief during gear design optimization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horváth et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: