Investigates fuel cell strategies for improving range of electric buses in cold environments, suggesting benefits for efficiency and performance.
The reduction in driving range during winter remains a major barrier to the widespread adoption of battery electric buses (BEBs), as battery performance degradation and increased Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) energy demand significantly raise total energy consumption. This study investigates the use of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) as auxiliary power units for range-extended electric buses (FC-REEBs) under low-temperature conditions to address this challenge. A comprehensive dynamic model was developed in MATLAB/Simulink 2025a version, integrating a fuel cell system, lithium-ion battery, power conversion unit, vehicle dynamics, and cabin thermal model. The model was evaluated under the World Harmonized Vehicle Cycle (WHVC) to compare three fuel cell operation strategies defined by fuel cell capacity and operating modes for cabin heating and battery charging. Performance was compared in terms of SOC variation, fuel cell loading patterns, hydrogen consumption, and equivalent fuel economy. Results indicate that the high-capacity strategy improves SOC stability but increases hydrogen consumption and reduces overall efficiency. In contrast, the strategy prioritizing cabin heating with minimal battery charging effectively utilizes waste heat and achieves the highest equivalent fuel economy. These findings highlight key trade-offs among different operating strategies and demonstrate that fuel cells can significantly enhance BEB efficiency and driving performance in cold environments while reducing battery load.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Woo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: