Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates a new AI methodology for independent researchers, suggesting improved research credibility.
We present FORGEry, a multi-model adversarial research methodology enabling independent researchers to produce credible, reproducible AI research results without institutional infrastructure. FORGEry structures collaboration between large language models in strictly separated roles — execution substrate and architectural interrogator — with the human researcher as the sole cross-model routing node. Version 1.1 adds a Scorecard Layer — three orthogonal maturity scales (Bathtub to Blueprint, Today to Terminator, Nuts to Nobel) — applied before any irreversible Act, so "forge" does not become "forgery." We demonstrate validity through a concrete result: structural weight mapping from Mamba2-2.7B to Mamba3 (CE ratio 1.0016 on random tokens), prior to the Mamba team's reference model release. The nine-point weight mapping is open-sourced at https://github.com/Rta-Forge/heists-galore. The reference checkpoint is at https://huggingface.co/RtaForge/Mamba3-2.7B. The structural mapping was produced using the FORGEry adversarial methodology. All architectural decisions and validation were performed by the author; execution substrate and interrogator roles were filled by frontier LLMs under strict role separation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guha Swaminathan Kashyap (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: