Demonstrates improved ductility and impact resistance in recycled polypropylene, indicating a novel upcycling method.
Single-use polypropylene (PP) food containers represent a rapidly growing waste stream characterized by compositional heterogeneity and microstructural defects. Conventional reactive compatibilization using isotactic maleic anhydride-grafted PP (iPP-g-MA) provides rigid crystalline anchoring but lacks the interfacial flexibility to accommodate complex micro-defects. Herein, we propose a defect-tolerant compatibilization strategy by developing a binary iPP-g-MA/aPP-g-MA masterbatch for real post-consumer rPP derived from food-service containers. The amorphous aPP-g-MA component is proposed to provide a compliant interfacial environment that accommodates stress concentrations associated with microscale defects, whereas the iPP-g-MA component contributes crystalline anchoring with the recycled PP matrix. This soft/hard interfacial architecture is supported by grafting-degree analysis, GPC, XRD, DSC crystallization behavior, and SEM fracture morphology. The 1:1 mass-ratio binary formulation shows a marked improvement in elongation at break to 200%, representing a 203% increase relative to the single-component iMA system. The notched Charpy impact strength is enhanced to 8.98 kJ m−2, while tensile strength is retained at 20.9 MPa within the typical strength–ductility trade-off of polymer toughening. TGA shows no premature degradation within the melt-processing window, indicating adequate thermal stability for melt reprocessing. This study provides a compositionally tunable, data-supported route for high-value upcycling of heterogeneous post-consumer polyolefins. From an application viewpoint, the improved ductility-impact balance makes the material relevant to injection-moulded semi-structural products such as storage crates, appliance housings, and automotive interior panels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: