PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 27, 2026History of Science0 citationsOpen Access

A tale of two genera; or, how plant specimens from Japan contributed to the greatest legend in American botany

View Full Paper
KHKuang‐chi HungLCLeo Chu

Key Points

  • This article aims to explore how the materiality of plant specimens influenced scientific practices and identities in America and Japan.
  • Analyzed Asa Gray's interaction with plant specimens and their role in his network of collectors.
  • Examined honzōgaku scholars' perceptions of specimens in Tokugawa Japan.
  • Illustrated the transpacific network between American botanists and Japanese scholars.
  • Asa Gray created the genus Shortia prompted by an incomplete specimen and mobilized collectors to find it.
  • A parallel network emerged in Japan, leading to the new genus Schizocodon based on the appreciation of materiality.
  • Gray used specimens of Schizocodon to support his classification of Shortia and his theory of disjunct distribution.

Abstract

This article investigates how the materiality of plant specimens influenced scientists’ practice, network-building, and the imagination of professional identity through Asa Gray’s encounter with a fragmented specimen. We highlight how the incomplete specimen prompted Gray to create the genus Shortia and mobilize his network of collectors to locate the plant in its natural habitat. We then turn to a parallel network emerging in Tokugawa Japan among scholars of honzōgaku (Japan’s materia medica), who were similarly amazed by the materiality of specimens. Plant fragments thus gained a central role in the collaboration between honzō scholars and European botanists, leading to the naming of a new genus, Schizocodon . Finally, as specimens of Schizocodon traveled to the United States, Gray used them to corroborate his classification of Shortia and his biogeographical theory of disjunct distribution. This article delineates how the materiality of specimens inspired, connected, and frustrated the scientists, while simultaneously being modified, translated, and redefined. Putting together these fragments allows us to rediscover the contested yet entangled relation between the two genera, between the multiple transpacific networks, and ultimately between scientists and specimens.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hung et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a168b160c924ddd1bd59f4ahttps://doi.org/10.1177/00732753251356018
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Places and affects in the “perfect garden”: Miyabe Kingo and the making of a botanist in Hokkaido, 1860–892026
  2. 2The Japanese Survey of Materia Medica in Korea and the Transformation of the Japanese Study of Nature in the Eighteenth Century2024
  3. 3Announcement of the 19th Plant Species Biology Best Paper Award ( PSB Award)2026
  4. 4Specimens in Hand2025
  5. 5Biotic Borders: Transpacific Plant and Insect Migration and the Rise of Anti-Asian Racism in America, 1890–19502024 · 1 citations