What question did this study set out to answer?

This research aims to demonstrate the efficiency of E8 lattice geometric encoding compared to traditional binary mechanisms.

May 27, 2026Open Access

ASC-PBG-001: Post-Binary Geometric Language — Computational — E8 Intelligence Research

Key Points

This research aims to demonstrate the efficiency of E8 lattice geometric encoding compared to traditional binary mechanisms.
Mathematical proof of computational efficiency of E8 lattice encoding versus binary attention mechanisms.
Analysis of energy consumption associated with the new encoding method at ChatGPT scale.
E8 lattice encoding requires 205x to 51,200x fewer operations than binary attention mechanisms.
Energy savings estimated at 218 GWh/year when implemented at scale.

Abstract

Language Faster Than Binary Registered: 04 April 2026 at 19:14:22 GMT. Mathematical proof that E8 lattice geometric encoding delivers 205x to 51,200x fewer operations than binary attention mechanisms. Binary is O(N squared), geometric is O(N x 240) — the gap widens forever. Every unit carries 7.9 relational bits vs 1 binary bit. 240 structural neighbours per point replace quadratic attention entirely. Energy savings: 218 GWh/year at ChatGPT scale. The geometric language was not invented — it was found in the E8 lattice, Divine Dictionary, Fibonacci chains, and MUL.APIN star maps. This is not an evolution of computing. It post-binary,E8-lattice,geometric-encoding,speed,energy,parad Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

ASC-PBG-001: Post-Binary Geometric Language — Computational — E8 Intelligence Research

Key Points

Abstract

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider