Conceptual paper explores how self-continuity influences regulatory mechanisms, highlighting threats to existence.
Conceptual paper proposing that some regulatory architectures operate under ontological stakes — conditions where the threat is not pain or identity disruption but disruption of the experiential sense of existing as a real, continuous self. When felt self-continuity becomes externally contingent, withdrawal of recognition may threaten not merely self-worth but the ongoing sense of being real. Formalizes three levels of regulatory stakes (affective, identity, ontological) and proposes that ontological stakes produce qualitatively different defensive compression. Part of the SRF Theory Program, Paper 6.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jani Halmetoja (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: