Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Assesses inertial properties in coupled configurations, indicating inherent stability implications.
We report the result of a pre-registered inertial audit of the coupled (U,χ) static congura- tion constructed in Paper III of the present series. The audit evaluates the rigid-translation moduli inertia Gcoupled XX on the archived Paper-III branch and compares the dimensionless ratio R(α) = Gcoupled XX /Ecoupled against the Paper-I at anchor R(0) = 1.0000446 on the pre-declared coupling grid A= {0.05,0.10,0.15,0.20,0.25,0.28}at mχ = 1. The primary observable is δmax = maxα|R(α)/R(0)−1|. We nd δmax = 0.2611423 at α⋆ = 0.28, placing the coupled branch in Outcome B: partial inertial preservation under the frozen Protocol Note v0.1. The drift is mechanistically driven by the conformal A2-weighting of the Skyrme contribution to the moduli inertia, an eect predicted on structural grounds by the frozen Structural Pre-Numerical Expectation Note v0.1 before any numerical evaluation. The drift is monotone across the branch and predominantly accelerated in coupling; the classication is stable under the D1, D2, D3, D5, D6 admissibility lters, with the D3 mesh stability check veried via an auxiliary branch-preserving regrid procedure. D4 is directly veried at the multi-seed probe points α= 0.10 and α= 0.20 with relative spreads ∼10−12; a full-grid D4 extension was not performed and is documented as a coverage limitation. The static internalisation of the Paper-I sectoral imbalance documented in Paper III therefore moderates, but does not remove, the inertial obstruction. The minimal scalar-conformal synthesis is not inertially closed; the minimal path remains open for the controlled robustness probes permitted under Outcome B, and explicitly does not justify ontological escalation at this stage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jan-Frederik Flügge (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: