Demonstrates MIBS susceptibility to quantum attacks, indicating a need for cryptographic reassessment.
The advent of quantum computing necessitates a rigorous reassessment of classical cryptographic primitives, particularly lightweight block ciphers (LBCs) deployed in resource-constrained environments. This work presents a comprehensive quantum implementation and security analysis of the Feistel-based LBC MIBS against quantum cryptanalysis. Using the inherent reversibility of its structure, we develop a novel ancilla-free quantum circuit that optimizes qubit count and depth. For MIBS-64 and MIBS-80, our implementation achieves quantum costs of 23,371 and 24,363, requiring 128 and 144 qubits, respectively, with a depth of 4,768. We subsequently quantify the cipher’s vulnerability to Grover’s key-search algorithm under the NIST PQC security constraint <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <m:mi mathvariant="monospace">M</m:mi> <m:mi mathvariant="monospace">A</m:mi> <m:mi mathvariant="monospace">X</m:mi> <m:mi mathvariant="monospace">D</m:mi> <m:mi mathvariant="monospace">E</m:mi> <m:mi mathvariant="monospace">P</m:mi> <m:mi mathvariant="monospace">T</m:mi> <m:mi mathvariant="monospace">H</m:mi> </m:math> MAXDEPTH . By constructing Grover oracles using inner parallelization with multiple plaintext-ciphertext pairs to suppress false positives, we demonstrate total quantum attack costs of approximately 2 94 for MIBS-64 and 2 111 for MIBS-80. These values fall below NIST’s Level-1 security threshold (2 170 ), confirming the susceptibility of both MIBS variants to quantum key-recovery attacks despite their classical lightweight efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Çıldıroğlu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: