Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Although antiracism has existed as long as there has been racism, social scientists’ attention to antiracism has increased in the past decade. In this essay, I argue that the body of scholarship on antiracism is characterized by three main strands: (1) a macro focus on the ideology and structure of antiracist social movement organizations, often attempting to distil ‘the real’ antiracism from others deemed not critical or radical enough to qualify; (2) a micro focus on what motivates individuals to become antiracist, usually concentrating more on whites and using an a priori assumption that people of colour are automatic antiracists; and (3) a more promising interest in the antiracisms of the racial middle (Latinos, Asians, multiracials). This latter focus is emerging with a handful of scholars largely outside the United States, questioning the assumptions of the previous two strands, and offering interesting potential for the future of the field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eileen M. O’Brien (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: