Key result
Rhythm control strategies require better therapeutic instruments with optimized risk-benefit profiles to improve the prognosis of patients with atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Does rhythm control therapy improve prognosis in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to rate control?
Does rhythm control therapy improve prognosis in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to rate control?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conventional rhythm control with antiarrhythmic drugs has not shown prognostic benefit over rate control in atrial fibrillation, highlighting the need for improved rhythm control strategies with optimized risk-benefit profiles.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a global healthcare problem of growing prevalence and major significance. The consequences of AF include an increased rate of death, stroke and heart failure. Theoretically, a therapeutic strategy aiming at restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm should offset the prognosis impairment associated with AF. However, these expectations were disproven in large randomised controlled trials comparing conventional antiarrhythmic drugs for rhythm control with conventional rate control. These apparently contradictory findings suggest that rhythm control strategies require better therapeutic instruments. These improvements may involve drugs and/or interventions with optimised risk-benefit profile and which also appreciate the specific atrial pathology and the patient's comorbidities. This article addresses important aspects of rhythm control strategies, which may have the potential of a beneficial contribution to the prognosis of AF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rolf et al. (2015) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Rhythm control therapy vs. Rate control was evaluated. Rhythm control strategies require better therapeutic instruments with optimized risk-benefit profiles to improve the prognosis of patients with atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: