Key result
Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography demonstrated robust diagnostic performance in detecting left ventricular dysfunction defined by cardiac magnetic resonance, achieving an AUC of 0.887.
Why the study?
Large-scale validation of AI-enhanced electrocardiography against cardiac magnetic resonance parameters in a multiethnic general population remains limited.
Does artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography accurately detect structural and functional cardiac abnormalities compared to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in a general population?
Observational (n=38,804)
Does artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography accurately detect structural and functional cardiac abnormalities compared to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in a general population?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.887 (95% CI 0.866-0.907)
AI-enhanced ECG analysis demonstrates strong diagnostic accuracy for detecting CMR-defined structural and functional cardiac abnormalities in a large general population, supporting its potential as a scalable screening tool.
May support AI-ECG screening for LV dysfunction; hypothesis-generating in this observational cohort and requires prospective validation.
Background Although artificial intelligence–enhanced electrocardiography (AI-ECG) has shown promise in detecting cardiac abnormalities, large-scale validation against cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters in a multiethnic general population remains limited. Methods In 38,804 UK Biobank participants with paired ECG and CMR data, we evaluated six AI-ECG models: four targeting functional abnormalities (left and right ventricular dysfunction [QCG-LVD and QCG-RVD], global longitudinal strain [ECG-LVGLS and ECG-RVGLS]) and two targeting structural abnormalities (left ventricular hypertrophy [AI-ECG-LVH] and left atrial enlargement [AI-ECG-LAE]). Abnormalities were defined as the top 1% extreme values of each CMR-derived parameter. Results The AI-ECG models demonstrated robust diagnostic performance. For left ventricular dysfunction, the AUCs were 0.887 (QCG-LVD) and 0.896 (ECG-LVGLS); for right ventricular dysfunction, the AUCs were 0.778 (QCG-RVD) and 0.825 (ECG-RVGLS). In a sub-cohort with available corresponding CMR data (n=21,267), AUCs were 0.824 for AI-ECG-LVH and 0.883 for AI-ECG-LAE. Subgroup analyses showed consistent performance across demographic and clinical groups, with enhanced accuracy observed in older individuals, males, and those with hypertension. Conclusion In this large-scale, population-based study, AI-ECG demonstrated strong performance in detecting structural and functional cardiac abnormalities defined by CMR. These findings support the potential utility of AI-ECG as a scalable screening tool for cardiovascular disease in general populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Cardiac structural and functional abnormalities (n=38,804). Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Electrocardiography (AI-ECG) vs. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was evaluated on Detection of left ventricular dysfunction (QCG-LVD) (AUC 0.887, 95% CI 0.866-0.907). Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography demonstrated robust diagnostic performance in detecting left ventricular dysfunction defined by cardiac magnetic resonance, achieving an AUC of 0.887.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: