Key result
Conduction velocity variations minimally impact epicardial activation times, showing ~11% localized differences by pacing site.
Why the study?
Individual variability in parameter settings can impact accuracy when simulating the electrical behavior of the heart, leaving the impact of conduction velocity uncertainty on propagation simulations unclear.
Uncertainty quantification demonstrates that physiological variations in conduction velocity have only a minor impact on simulated epicardial activation times, though the pacing site significantly influences the localized coefficient of variation.
Individual variability in parameter settings, due to either user selection or disease states, can impact accuracy when simulating the electrical behavior of the heart. Here, we aim to test the impact of inevitable uncertainty in conduction velocities (CVs) on the output of simulations of cardiac propagation, given three stimulus locations on the left ventricular (LV) free wall. To understand the role of physiological variability in CV in simulations of cardiac activation, we generated detailed maps of the variability in propagation simulations by implementing bi-ventricular activation simulations and quantified the effects by deploying robust uncertainty quantification techniques based on polynomial chaos expansion (PCE). PCE allows efficient stochastic exploration with reduced computational demand by utilizing an emulator for the underlying forward model. Our results suggest that CV within healthy physiological ranges plays a small role in the activation times across all stimulation locations. However, we noticed differences in variation coefficients depending on the stimulation site, i.e., LV endocardium, midmyocardium, and epicardium. We observed low levels of variation in activation times near the earliest activation sites, whereas there was higher variation toward the termination sites. These results suggest that CV variability can play a role when simulating healthy and diseased states.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Busatto et al. (2023) studied Healthy heart (computational model). Uncertainty quantification of conduction velocity (90-110 cm/s) was evaluated on Mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation of activation times on the epicardial surface. Uniform variations in conduction velocity between 90-110 cm/s have minimal impact on epicardial activation times, with the coefficient of variation showing localized differences up to 11% depending on the pacing site.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: