Key result
fNIRS offers greater accessibility and mobility than fMRI for haemodynamic-based neurofeedback despite methodological challenges.
Why the study?
Transferring validated fMRI haemodynamic-based neurofeedback protocols to mobile fNIRS presents important fNIRS-specific methodological challenges that novices may miss.
fNIRS offers increased user accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and mobility for haemodynamic-based neurofeedback, potentially expanding its scope to real-world environments.
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Neurofeedback allows individuals to monitor and self-regulate their brain activity, potentially improving human brain function. Beyond the traditional electrophysiological approach using primarily electroencephalography, brain haemodynamics measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and more recently, functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) have been used (haemodynamic-based neurofeedback), particularly to improve the spatial specificity of neurofeedback. Over recent years, especially fNIRS has attracted great attention because it offers several advantages over fMRI such as increased user accessibility, cost-effectiveness and mobility-the latter being the most distinct feature of fNIRS. The next logical step would be to transfer haemodynamic-based neurofeedback protocols that have already been proven and validated by fMRI to mobile fNIRS. However, this undertaking is not always easy, especially since fNIRS novices may miss important fNIRS-specific methodological challenges. This review is aimed at researchers from different fields who seek to exploit the unique capabilities of fNIRS for neurofeedback. It carefully addresses fNIRS-specific challenges and offers suggestions for possible solutions. If the challenges raised are addressed and further developed, fNIRS could emerge as a useful neurofeedback technique with its own unique application potential-the targeted training of brain activity in real-world environments, thereby significantly expanding the scope and scalability of haemodynamic-based neurofeedback applications.This article is part of the theme issue 'Neurofeedback: new territories and neurocognitive mechanisms of endogenous neuromodulation'.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May broaden neurofeedback to real-world settings; leaves open protocol standardization before clinical adoption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klein et al. (2024) conducted a review in haemodynamic-based neurofeedback. functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) vs. functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was evaluated. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) offers increased accessibility and mobility for haemodynamic-based neurofeedback compared to fMRI, despite specific methodological challenges.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: