Key result
fNIRS neurofeedback increases bilateral DLPFC activity and reduces left DLPFC-insula connectivity versus sham.
Why the study?
It was critical to evaluate whether the success of fNIRS-informed real-time neurofeedback translates into neural and behavioral working memory enhancement in the absence of feedback.
Does single-session fNIRS-informed neurofeedback of the left DLPFC improve neural and behavioral working memory performance in healthy individuals?
RCT (n=62)
Sham-controlled
Randomized
Does single-session fNIRS-informed neurofeedback of the left DLPFC improve neural and behavioral working memory performance in healthy individuals?
A single session of fNIRS-informed neurofeedback enables healthy individuals to volitionally increase left DLPFC activity, translating into working memory-related neural activation and connectivity changes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Single-session fNIRS-NF causally modulates DLPFC activity and connectivity in healthy adults; extends neurofeedback to single-session fNIRS protocols while leaving behavioral WM effects open.
Working memory (WM) represents a building-block of higher cognitive functions and a wide range of mental disorders are associated with WM impairments. Initial studies have shown that several sessions of functional nearinfrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) informed real-time neurofeedback (NF) allow healthy individuals to volitionally increase activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), a region critically involved in WM. For the translation to therapeutic or neuroenhancement applications, however, it is critical to assess whether fNIRS-NF success transfers into neural and behavioral WM enhancement in the absence of feedback. We therefore combined single-session fNIRS-NF of the left DLPFC with a randomized sham-controlled design (N = 62 participants) and a subsequent WM challenge with concomitant functional MRI. Over four runs of fNIRS-NF, the left DLPFC NF training group demonstrated enhanced neural activity in this region, reflecting successful acquisition of neural selfregulation. During the subsequent WM challenge, we observed no evidence for performance differences between the training and the sham group. Importantly, however, examination of the fMRI data revealed that - compared to the sham group - the training group exhibited significantly increased regional activity in the bilateral DLPFC and decreased left DLPFC - left anterior insula functional connectivity during the WM challenge. Exploratory analyses revealed a negative association between DLPFC activity and WM reaction times in the NF group. Together, these findings indicate that healthy individuals can learn to volitionally increase left DLPFC activity in a single training session and that the training success translates into WM-related neural activation and connectivity changes in the absence of feedback. This renders fNIRS-NF as a promising and scalable WM intervention approach that could be applied to various mental disorders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Healthy individuals (n=62). fNIRS-informed real-time neurofeedback (fNIRS-NF) of the left DLPFC vs. Sham neurofeedback was evaluated on Neural and behavioral working memory enhancement (performance and fMRI activity/connectivity during subsequent working memory challenge). Single-session fNIRS-informed neurofeedback of the left DLPFC significantly increased bilateral DLPFC activity and decreased left DLPFC-anterior insula connectivity compared to sham.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: