Why the study?
Elderly patients with CAD face elevated risks for both ischemic and bleeding complications, prompting evaluation of antithrombotic therapy use and clinical outcomes in Chinese patients aged ≥ 65 years with elevated ischemic risk.
Does the choice of antithrombotic therapy and age affect ischemic and bleeding outcomes in elderly patients with high ischemic risk coronary artery disease?
Cohort (n=1,005)
Yes
Does the choice of antithrombotic therapy and age affect ischemic and bleeding outcomes in elderly patients with high ischemic risk coronary artery disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In elderly Chinese patients with high-risk CAD, age >75 years, reduced LVEF, and lower eGFR strongly predict adverse ischemic outcomes, while anticoagulation therapy significantly increases bleeding risk.
Background: Elderly patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) are at heightened risk for ischemic and bleeding complications. This study evaluates antithrombotic therapy use and its clinical outcomes in Chinese patients aged ≥ 65 years with CAD and elevated ischemic risk. Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled patients aged ≥ 65 years with diagnosed CAD and ≥ 1 high ischemic risk factor from two centers. We recorded major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)—death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal ischemic stroke—and bleeding events over a 2-year follow-up. Results: Of 1005 patients (mean age 76.3 ± 7.2 years; 25.3% female), 49.0% were aged 65– 75 and 51.0% were > 75. Antithrombotic regimens included no therapy (1.8%), single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT, 23.0%), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT, 64.3%), and anticoagulation (10.9%), with 60.9% of the latter combining antiplatelet therapy. Older patients (> 75 years) experienced higher MACE rates (11.5% vs 6.3%; RR: 1.825; 95% CI: 1.203– 2.769; p = 0.004) and a trend towards increased bleeding (8.4% vs 6.5%; p = 0.257). Notably, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were significantly higher in this group. Anticoagulation therapy was linked to a higher, yet non-significant, MACE rate and significantly increased bleeding risk compared to SAPT and DAPT. Multivariate analysis identified age > 75, LVEF < 50%, and eGFR < 50 mL/min/1.73 m 2 as predictors of mortality and MACE, with anticoagulation therapy increasing bleeding risk. Conclusion: In elderly CAD patients, those aged > 75 years exhibit higher mortality and MACE rates, with anticoagulation therapy associated with increased bleeding. Age, reduced LVEF, and renal function emerge as critical predictors of adverse outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease with high ischemic risk (n=1,005). Age > 75 years vs. Age 65-75 years was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, and nonfatal ischemic stroke (RR 1.825, 95% CI 1.203-2.769, p=0.004).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: