Key result
Among older patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease, antithrombotic strategy was not associated with improved 1-year adjusted outcomes, and overall warfarin use was low (38.9%).
Why the study?
Does the choice of antithrombotic strategy improve 1-year outcomes in older patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease?
Cohort (n=2,122)
Does the choice of antithrombotic strategy improve 1-year outcomes in older patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease?
In older patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease, warfarin use is low and the choice of antithrombotic strategy was not associated with improved 1-year outcomes.
Should not yet change antithrombotic practice in older AF-CAD patients; leaves open optimal regimens amid low warfarin use.
BACKGROUND: Older patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease (CAD) face high risk of stroke and bleeding with antithrombotic therapy. Balancing safe and effective use of aspirin, clopidogrel, and warfarin in this population is important. METHODS: From the Duke Databank for Cardiovascular Disease, we identified patients with AF ≥65 years old with angiographically confirmed CAD from 2000 to 2010. Antithrombotic use was described across age and Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age >75 years, Diabetes, prior Stroke/transient ischemic attack (CHADS(2)) stroke risk and Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) bleeding scores. Death and the composite of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke by antithrombotic strategy were reported. RESULTS: Of 2,122 patients ≥65 years old with AF and CAD, 477 (22.5%) were ≥80 years old; 1,133 (53.4%) had acute coronary syndromes. Overall rates of aspirin, clopidogrel, and warfarin use were 83.4%, 34.6%, and 38.9%, respectively. Compared with patients 65 to 79 years old, more patients ≥80 years old were at high stroke risk (CHADS(2) ≥2, 84.7% vs 57.8%) and high bleeding risk (ATRIA 5-10, 55.8% vs 23.3%). Warfarin use in both age groups increased with higher CHADS(2) scores and decreased with higher ATRIA scores. Of patients ≥80 years old with CHADS(2) ≥2, 150 (38.2%) received warfarin. Antithrombotic strategy was not associated with improved 1-year adjusted outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Among older patients with AF and CAD, overall warfarin use was low. Patients ≥80 years old at highest stroke risk received warfarin in similar proportions to the overall cohort. Further investigation into optimizing antithrombotic strategies in this population is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hess et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease (n=2,122). Antithrombotic therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel, warfarin) was evaluated on Death and the composite of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Among older patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease, antithrombotic strategy was not associated with improved 1-year adjusted outcomes, and overall warfarin use was low (38.9%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: