Key result
A right atrial incision during the Fontan operation did not reduce the incidence of sustained intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia compared to no incision (3.5% in both groups).
Why the study?
Does a prophylactic right atrial incision during the Fontan operation prevent intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia in pediatric patients with single ventricle anatomy?
RCT (n=134)
Double-blind
Randomly assigned
Does a prophylactic right atrial incision during the Fontan operation prevent intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia in pediatric patients with single ventricle anatomy?
A prophylactic right atrial incision during the Fontan operation did not reduce the incidence of intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia, though the overall modern incidence of this arrhythmia (3.5%) is considerably lower than historically reported.
Prophylactic right atrial incision is not warranted during Fontan; challenges prior rationale for preventing intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia.
BACKGROUND: Intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia (IART) after the Fontan operation had an early reported incidence of 10% to 35% during early and intermediate follow-up and posed substantial management challenges. METHODS AND RESULTS: To reduce the incidence of IART after the Fontan procedure, we performed a randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the impact of an incision in the right atrium joining the lateral tunnel suture line and the tricuspid valve annulus. Between March 1998 and September 2003, 134 subjects (median age: 1.8 years; range: 1.3-5.2 years; 91 men) were randomly assigned to receive the incision. All 134 patients had a form of single ventricle pathological anatomy. The clinical course, electrocardiograms, and Holter monitoring were available for review in 114 subjects at a median of 8.2-year follow-up (range: 0.9-11.9 years). There were 2 late deaths, neither subject had IART. The combined incidence of sustained IART was 3.5% (4/114). There was no difference in the occurrence of sustained IART between those subjects receiving the incision and those who did not (2 in each group) during follow-up. No patients of either group experienced short-term complications. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the fact that the primary outcome of this trial was not reached, the most significant finding was that with current management, the incidence of IART is considerably lower than the early retrospective, observational studies suggested.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Law et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in Single ventricle pathological anatomy undergoing Fontan operation (n=134). Right atrial incision joining the lateral tunnel suture line and tricuspid valve annulus vs. No incision was evaluated on Sustained intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia (IART). A right atrial incision during the Fontan operation did not reduce the incidence of sustained intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia compared to no incision (3.5% in both groups).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: