Key result
Radiofrequency ablation of the AV junction in Fontan patients with drug-resistant IART significantly reduced the mean number of antiarrhythmic medications from 2.8 to 0.7 (P<0.05).
Why the study?
Does radiofrequency ablation of the AV junction reduce the need for antiarrhythmic medications in postoperative Fontan patients with drug-resistant intraatrial reentrant tachycardia?
Observational (n=7)
Does radiofrequency ablation of the AV junction reduce the need for antiarrhythmic medications in postoperative Fontan patients with drug-resistant intraatrial reentrant tachycardia?
AV junction ablation after pacemaker implantation is an effective therapeutic option that significantly reduces the need for antiarrhythmic medications in Fontan patients with drug-resistant IART.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for AV junction ablation in Fontan IART; prospective trials needed before practice change.
INTRODUCTION: Drug-resistant intraatrial reentrant tachycardia (IART) occurs frequently after the Fontan operation and is a major cause of morbidity and rarely mortality. We describe our experience with AV junction ablation after pacemaker implantation in postoperative Fontan patients with drug-resistant IART. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed retrospective analysis of Fontan patients with IART and attempted radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the AV junction. Seven patients (6 male) were identified, with a mean age at Fontan of 9.3 years (range 5.8-13.3) and a median age at RFA of 18 years (range 14.5-23.3). Mean follow-up prior to RFA was 764 +/- 235 days and after RFA 1,541 +/- 1,235 days. IART was refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs in all patients, and all had undergone pacemaker placement. Mean onset of IART was 44.1 months (range 0-142) after Fontan. Mean duration of atrial arrhythmia prior to RFA was 72 +/- 48 m (range 16-148). Ablation of the AV junction was successful or partially successful in all patients. Complete AV block occurred in 6 patients. Normal AV conduction was not seen during a mean follow-up of 1,541 days. The mean number of antiarrhythmic medications decreased from 2.8 +/- 1.5 to 0.7 +/- 0.8 (P <0.05). CONCLUSION: In Fontan patients with drug-resistant IART, RFA of the AV junction with prior pacemaker implant is an effective therapeutic option. Despite the introduction of pacemaker dependence, this option should be considered in patients who did not respond to RFA of IART or who are at high operative risk for Fontan conversion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Friedman et al. (2005) conducted an observational in Drug-resistant intraatrial reentrant tachycardia (IART) after the Fontan operation (n=7). Radiofrequency ablation of the AV junction vs. Baseline (prior to ablation) was evaluated on Mean number of antiarrhythmic medications (p=<0.05). Radiofrequency ablation of the AV junction in Fontan patients with drug-resistant IART significantly reduced the mean number of antiarrhythmic medications from 2.8 to 0.7 (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: