Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 1, 2009Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Rates of change in naturalistic psychotherapy: Contrasting dose–effect and good-enough level models of change.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

SBScott A. BaldwinBrigham Young UniversityABArjan BerkeljonBrigham Young UniversityDADavid C. AtkinsLynn University

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Baldwin et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a16b02fc7240d1a707b7909https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015235
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research.1991 · 7,959 citations
  2. 2Responsiveness in psychotherapy.1998 · 447 citations
  3. 3Predicting counseling center clients' response to counseling: A 1-year follow-up.2001 · 58 citations
  4. 4Presidential address: What we have learned from a decade of research aimed at improving psychotherapy outcome in routine care2006 · 452 citations
  5. 5The dose—effect relationship in psychotherapy: A defining achievement for Dr. Kenneth Howard2003 · 59 citations