Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In part 1 of this series, the authors describe the importance of incomplete data in clinical research, and provide a conceptual framework for handling incomplete data by describing typical mechanisms and patterns of censoring, and detailing a variety of relatively simple methods and their limitations. In part 2, the authors will explore multiple imputation (MI), a more sophisticated and valid method for handling incomplete data in clinical research. This article will provide a detailed conceptual framework for MI, comparative examples of MI versus naive methods for handling incomplete data (and how different methods may impact subsequent study results), plus a practical user's guide to implementing MI, including sample statistical software MI code and a deidentified precoded database for use with the sample code.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Newgard et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: