Key result
Adult males from historically disadvantaged backgrounds, including African Americans and those whose mothers had high school education or lower, were more willing to risk brain damage for a football scholarship.
Cross-Sectional (n=726)
Individuals from historically disadvantaged backgrounds are more willing to accept the physical risks of college football in exchange for a scholarship.
Objective Over the past decade, increased scrutiny has been given to health‐related consequences of participating in American football. This study considers whether the known risk has affected individuals’ willingness to play at the intercollegiate level. Methods Drawing from a survey of 726 adult males, this study uses quantitative experimental vignette methodology to investigate factors associated with the self‐conscious choice to risk brain damage in exchange for a football scholarship. Results Respondents whose mothers’ highest level of education was high school or lower were especially willing to assume the known long‐term risk associated with playing college football, as were African Americans. Conclusions The findings may foreshadow a moral quandary should radical changes to football player safety not occur soon. If the sport's physical risks are acceptable mainly to those from historically disadvantaged backgrounds, it could be difficult for presidents, faculty, and other stakeholders to allow young men to represent their universities in this capacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ott et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Willingness to risk brain damage for a football scholarship (n=726). Experimental vignette methodology was evaluated on Self-conscious choice to risk brain damage in exchange for a football scholarship. Adult males from historically disadvantaged backgrounds, including African Americans and those whose mothers had high school education or lower, were more willing to risk brain damage for a football scholarship.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: