Key result
A review of anti-hypertensive agents in diabetic patients highlights the pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical trial evidence to guide treatment choices for preventing complications.
Why the study?
Does the choice of anti-hypertensive agents improve outcomes in diabetic subjects with hypertension?
Does the choice of anti-hypertensive agents improve outcomes in diabetic subjects with hypertension?
This review summarizes the pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical trial evidence for various anti-hypertensive agents in patients with diabetes to guide clinical practice.
Hypertension is an extremely common co-morbid condition in diabetes leading to acceleration in micro-vascular and macro-vascular complications. The use of anti-hypertensives in diabetic patients should be considered in the context of preventing the development of complications. Various factors contribute to the pathophysiology of diabetes in hypertension. With the advancements in technology, the understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms has increased, and this can contribute in providing evidence for beneficial role of certain anti-hypertensives. Many clinical trials have been carried out for use of diuretics, beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers. The present review gives an overview of pathophysiological mechanisms of hypertension and diabetes in addition to the details of clinical trials of anti-hypertensives in diabetic patients. This is an attempt to provide some evidences for the clinicians, which may serve as a guide for use of anti-hypertensives in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patel et al. (2013) conducted a review in Hypertension in diabetes. Anti-hypertensive agents was evaluated. A review of anti-hypertensive agents in diabetic patients highlights the pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical trial evidence to guide treatment choices for preventing complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: