PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 13, 2009Archives of Internal Medicine215 citations

Effectiveness of Physical Activity Advice and Prescription by Physicians in Routine Primary CareA Cluster Randomized Trial

View Full Paper
GGGonzalo Grandes

Key Result

Physical activity advice and prescription by family physicians increased physical activity by an adjusted difference of 18 min/wk (95% CI, 6-31) compared to standard care at 6 months.

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess the effectiveness of physician-led physical activity interventions on patient activity levels in primary care.
  • Randomized trial involving 56 Spanish family physicians assigned to intervention or standard care arms.
  • 4317 physically inactive patients recruited; intervention consisted of advice and prescriptions for physical activity.
  • Main outcome was change in physical activity, measured by blinded nurses using the 7-Day Physical Activity Recall.
  • Intervention patients increased physical activity by an adjusted difference of 18 min/wk (95% CI, 6-31 min/wk).
  • 3.9% more patients in the intervention group met minimal physical activity recommendations (1.2%-6.9%; NNT=26).
  • Significant effects observed in patients over 50 years (P < or = .01) and those receiving activity prescriptions (P < .001).

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=4,317)

Blinding

Single-blind

Randomization

Cluster randomized

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does physical activity advice and prescription by physicians increase physical activity in physically inactive primary care patients?

P
Population
4,317 physically inactive patients in routine primary care, recruited by 56 Spanish family physicians.
I
Intervention
Physical activity advice provided by physicians to all patients, plus a physical activity prescription for a subgroup attending an additional appointment (30%).
C
Comparator
Standard care.
O
Outcome
Change in physical activity measured by blinded nurses using the 7-Day Physical Activity Recall at 6 months.patient reported

Physician-delivered physical activity advice and prescription in primary care modestly increases physical activity levels in inactive patients.

Main Result

Effect estimate: Adjusted difference 18 min/wk (95% CI 6-31)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physical activity promotion is a priority, but contribution of physicians' interventions is unclear. The effectiveness of the PEPAF ("Experimental Program for Physical Activity Promotion"), which was implemented exclusively by physicians in routine primary care from October 2003 to December 2004, was assessed. METHODS: Fifty-six Spanish family physicians were randomized to either the intervention (n = 29) or standard care (n = 27) arm of the trial. The physicians recruited 4317 physically inactive patients (2248 for intervention and 2069 for control protocols) from a systematic sample after assessing their physical activity in routine practice. Intervention physicians provided advice to all patients and a physical activity prescription to the subgroup attending an additional appointment (30%). The main outcome measure was the change in physical activity measured by blinded nurses using the 7-Day Physical Activity Recall. Secondary outcomes included cardiorespiratory fitness and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: At 6 months, intervention patients increased physical activity more than controls (adjusted difference, 18 min/wk 95% confidence interval, 6-31 min/wk; metabolic equivalent tasks x hours per week, 1.3 95% CI, 0.4-2.2). The proportion of the population achieving minimal physical activity recommendations was 3.9% higher in the intervention group (1.2%-6.9%; number needed to treat, 26). No differences were found in secondary outcomes. The effect of intervention was positively modified in subjects older than 50 years (P < or = .01) and in the prescription subgroup (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Family physicians were effective for increasing physical activity of primary care patients. Overall clinical effect was small but relevant for population public health. Within the intervention program, clinically relevant effects were seen in patients receiving a physical activity prescription. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00131079.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gonzalo Grandes (2009) conducted an RCT in Physically inactive (n=4,317). Physical activity advice and prescription (PEPAF) vs. Standard care was evaluated on Change in physical activity measured by the 7-Day Physical Activity Recall (Adjusted difference 18 min/wk, 95% CI 6-31). Physical activity advice and prescription by family physicians increased physical activity by an adjusted difference of 18 min/wk (95% CI, 6-31) compared to standard care at 6 months.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a16c33c7cba52b0f77b91a3https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.23
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparing physical activity prescription with verbal advice for general practice patients with cardiovascular risk factors: results from the PEPPER randomised controlled trial2023 · 28 citations
  2. 2Physical activity prescription for general practice patients with cardiovascular risk factors–the PEPPER randomised controlled trial protocol2019 · 20 citations
  3. 3Long-term physical activity on prescription intervention for patients with insufficient physical activity level—a randomized controlled trial2020 · 45 citations
  4. 4Effectiveness of a medical exercise prescription to promote physical activity in children: a pragmatic randomized trial in primary care2026
  5. 5Effectiveness of Physical Activity with Sports Scientist (PASS) Programme Among Patients with Non-Communicable Diseases in Primary Care: A Randomised Controlled Trial2025