Randomised controlled trial shows increased physical activity levels in patients with non-communicable diseases, indicating effective integration of sports scientists in primary care.
Objectives: This study examined the effectiveness of a physical activity (PA) promotion intervention administered by a sports scientist as part of team-based care in a primary care setting. Methods: A randomised controlled trial was conducted. Physically inactive participants aged 35–70 years with non-communicable diseases (NCDs) were recruited. All participants received PA screening by a nurse and brief PA counselling by a physician. The intervention group also received a tailored PA programme at the first visit and monthly phone calls for 6–8 months (from visit 1 to visit 3). Outcome assessments by a sports scientist were performed for both groups at every visit (visit 1: baseline, visit 2: follow-up, visit 3: end-point, visit 4: continuing). Outcomes included meeting PA recommendations and weekly time spent in aerobic PA. An intention-to-treat analysis was applied. Results: Sixty participants were randomly allocated to each group. At visit 2 (months 3–4), significantly higher proportion of participants in the intervention group were meeting PA recommendations compared with the control group: aerobic PA (23.3% vs. 6.7%, p < 0.05), muscle-strengthening activity (31.7% vs. 0%, p < 0.001), and multicomponent PA (20.0% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). Median time spent in moderate- to vigorous-intensity PA (MVPA) was also higher (90 min/week vs. 60 min/week, p < 0.05). Weekly MVPA time increased significantly from baseline in both groups. Conclusions: Integrating a sports scientist into team-based care effectively improved short-term PA levels when intervention intensity was highest. The team-based care integrating sports scientists into primary care may enhance PA promotion for patients with NCDs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wattanapisit et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: