Key result
AF termination during ablation is linked to ~22% lower long-term arrhythmia recurrence risk vs nontermination.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to validate the predictive role of atrial fibrillation termination in long-term arrhythmia recurrence following persistent atrial fibrillation ablation.
Does atrial fibrillation termination during ablation predict reduced long-term recurrence of atrial arrhythmia in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Meta-Analysis
Does atrial fibrillation termination during ablation predict reduced long-term recurrence of atrial arrhythmia in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Effect estimate: RR 0.78 (95% CI 0.68-1.90)
Atrial fibrillation termination during ablation procedures serves as an effective predictor for long-term procedural success and reduced arrhythmia recurrence in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
AF termination may aid post-ablation risk stratification; supports its role as a prognostic marker in persistent AF.
Background: In this systematic review and meta‐analysis, we aimed to validate the predictive role of atrial fibrillation (AF) termination in long‐term arrhythmia recurrence. Method: Our search encompassed databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library up to August 1, 2021. Three independent reviewers conducted screening and data extraction. The data included ablation strategy, recurrence mode, AF termination mode, numbers of patients, and recurrence cases in the termination and nontermination groups. The primary endpoint was the recurrence of atrial arrhythmia at long‐term follow‐up (≥ 12 months). Results: Our analysis included 22 publications, with 11 prospective studies being eligible for further meta‐analysis. Among these, 14 studies reported significantly lower rates of arrhythmia recurrence in the AF termination group compared to the nontermination group. Among seven studies involving 1114 patients that examined single procedure outcomes, the pooled estimated effect was RR 0.78 (95% CI 0.68–1.90) with an I 2 value of 57%. Subgroup analysis focusing on termination mode as sinus rhythm yielded a pooled estimated effect of RR 0.74 (95% CI 0.59–0.92) with an I 2 value of 47%. Additionally, analysis of seven studies involving 1433 patients for repeat procedures demonstrated a significant preference for the AF termination group (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71–0.97, I 2 = 84 % ). Subgroup analysis indicated reduced heterogeneity when the termination mode was sinus rhythm (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51–0.90, I 2 = 57 % ). Conclusion: Our study establishes that AF termination serves as an effective predictor for the success of persistent AF ablation procedures. This finding holds potential implications for clinical practice and contributes to our understanding of long‐term arrhythmia recurrence in the context of AF termination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in Persistent atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation termination during ablation vs. Nontermination was evaluated on Recurrence of atrial arrhythmia at long-term follow-up (≥ 12 months) (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68-1.90). Atrial fibrillation termination during ablation was associated with a lower risk of long-term arrhythmia recurrence compared to nontermination (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.68-1.90 for single procedures).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: