PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 26, 2001Circulation Research77 citationsOpen Access

Mechanistic Insights Into Very Slow Conduction in Branching Cardiac Tissue

View Full Paper
JKJan KučeraYRYoram Rudy

Key Result

Blocking the retrograde 'push' effect of depolarizing current in multiple branching strands of cardiac tissue models significantly slowed overall conduction velocity or caused conduction failure.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Strands of Luo-Rudy dynamic model cells (computational model of cardiac tissue)
I
Intervention
Blocking the 'push' effect (preventing retrograde current flow from branches into the main strand)
C
Comparator
Intact 'push' effect (allowing retrograde current flow)
O
Outcome
Propagation velocity and safety (local propagation delay, overall conduction velocity, conduction failure)surrogate

Computational modeling confirms that the 'pull and push' mechanism in branching cardiac tissue allows for slow but robust conduction, providing insights into AV node conduction and reentrant arrhythmias.

Abstract

It is known that branching strands of cardiac tissue can form a substrate for very slow conduction. The branches slow conduction by acting as current loads drawing depolarizing current from the main strand ("pull" effect). It has been suggested that, upon depolarization of the branches, they become current sources reinjecting current back into the strand, thus enhancing propagation safety ("push" effect). It was the aim of this study to verify this hypothesis and to assess the contribution of the push effect to propagation velocity and safety. Conduction was investigated in strands of Luo-Rudy dynamic model cells that branch from either a single branch point or from multiple successive branch points. In single-branching strands, blocking the push effect by not allowing current to flow retrogradely from the branches into the strand did not significantly increase the branching-induced local propagation delay. However, in multiple branching strands, blocking the push effect resulted in a significant slowing of overall conduction velocity or even in conduction failure. Furthermore, for certain slow velocities, the safety factor for propagation was higher when slow conduction was caused by branching tissue geometry than by reduced excitability without branching. Therefore, these results confirm the proposed "pull and push" mechanism of slow, but nevertheless robust, conduction in branching structures. Slow conduction based on this mechanism could occur in the atrioventricular node, where multiple branching is structurally present. It could also support reentrant excitation in diseased myocardium where the substrate is structurally complex.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kučera et al. (2001) studied Very slow conduction in branching cardiac tissue. Blocking the push effect (retrograde current flow) vs. Intact push effect was evaluated on Propagation velocity and safety. Blocking the retrograde 'push' effect of depolarizing current in multiple branching strands of cardiac tissue models significantly slowed overall conduction velocity or caused conduction failure.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a16c57ab13aec50ea6b7ef2https://doi.org/10.1161/hh2101.098442
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Changes in conduction velocity during acute ischemia in ventricular myocardium of the isolated porcine heart.1986 · 263 citations
  2. 2A dynamic model of the cardiac ventricular action potential. I. Simulations of ionic currents and concentration changes.1994 · 1,597 citations
  3. 3Patterned growth of neonatal rat heart cells in culture. Morphological and electrophysiological characterization.1991 · 217 citations
  4. 4A Combined Morphological and Electrophysiological Study of the Atrioventricular Node of the Rabbit Heart1974 · 170 citations
  5. 5Action potential propagation in inhomogeneous cardiac tissue: safety factor considerations and ionic mechanism2000 · 154 citations