Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article argues that a new diagram is emerging in the criminal justice system as it encounters developments in the neurosciences. This does not take the form that concerns many "neuroethicists" -- it does not entail a challenge to doctrines of free will and the notion of the autonomous legal subject -- but is developing around the themes of susceptibility, risk, pre-emption and precaution. I term this diagram "screen and intervene" and in this article I attempt to trace out this new configuration and consider some of the consequences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nikolas Rose (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: