Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Gravitational-wave signals from binary neutron-star coalescences carry information about the star's equation of state in their tidal signatures. A major issue in the inference of the tidal parameters (or, directly, of the equation of state) is the systematic error introduced by the waveform approximants. We use a bottom-up approach based on gauge-invariant phase analysis and the Fisher information matrix to investigate waveform systematics and identify biases in parameter estimation. A mock analysis of 15 different binaries indicates that systematics in current waveform models dominate over statistical errors at signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) 80 for LIGO and Virgo at design sensitivity. This implies biases in the inference of the reduced tidal parameter that are larger than the statistical 90% credible intervals. For example, while the neutron-star radius could be constrained at the ~5% level at SNR 80, systematics can be at the ~10% level. We apply our approach to GW170817 (SNR~30) and confirm that no significant systematic effects are present. Using frequencies below 1 kHz for the analysis, we estimate a neutron-star radius of 12.5_-1.8+1.1 km. The latter is consistent with an electromagnetic-informed prior and the recent NICER measurement. Exploring SNR100 in view of third-generation detectors, we find that all the current waveform models lead to differences of at least 1σ in the inference of the reduced tidal parameter. We conclude that current waveform models, including those from numerical relativity, are insufficient to infer the equation of state in the loudest (and potentially most informative) events that will be observed by advanced and third-generation detectors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gamba et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: