Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Scaling of dynamic rupture processes from small to large earthquakes is critical to seismic hazard assessment. Large subduction earthquakes are typically remote, and we mostly rely on teleseismic body waves to extract information on their slip rate functions. We estimate the P wave source spectra of 942 thrust earthquakes of magnitude M w 5.5 and above by carefully removing wave propagation effects (geometrical spreading, attenuation, and free surface effects). The conventional spectral model of a single‐corner frequency and high‐frequency falloff rate does not explain our data, and we instead introduce a double‐corner‐frequency model, modified from the Haskell propagating source model, with an intermediate falloff of f −1 . The first corner frequency f 1 relates closely to the source duration T 1 , its scaling follows for M w <7.5, and changes to for larger earthquakes. An elliptical rupture geometry better explains the observed scaling than circular crack models. The second time scale T 2 varies more weakly with moment, , varies weakly with depth, and can be interpreted either as expressions of starting and stopping phases, as a pulse‐like rupture, or a dynamic weakening process. Estimated stress drops and scaled energy (ratio of radiated energy over seismic moment) are both invariant with seismic moment. However, the observed earthquakes are not self‐similar because their source geometry and spectral shapes vary with earthquake size. We find and map global variations of these source parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Denolle et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: