Key result
Fast simulator training yields similar efficiency scores to conventional protocols for robotic surgery novices.
Why the study?
With robot-assisted surgery on the rise, feasible and effective simulator training protocols are needed to prepare surgical residents.
Does a fast simulator training protocol improve efficiency scores compared to a conventional protocol in robotic surgery novices?
RCT (n=52)
1:1
Does a fast simulator training protocol improve efficiency scores compared to a conventional protocol in robotic surgery novices?
Absolute Event Rate: 48.2% vs 52.3%
p-value: p=0.527
A short-course simulator training protocol was not significantly different from a conventional protocol in improving efficiency scores for robotic surgery novices, though both may be insufficient for complex exercises.
Fast simulator training yields comparable efficiency scores to conventional protocols in robotic novices; confirms abbreviated curricula as viable without early skill loss.
Objectives As robot-assisted surgery (RAS) is on the rise, feasible and effective simulator training for surgical residents is needed. This study compares the effectiveness and feasibility of two compact simulator training protocols on the DaVinci skills simulator (dVSS) for preparing robotic surgery novices. Methods In this randomized controlled trial, RAS novices were randomized 1:1 into a conventional group (Control), including four repetitions of five simulator exercises in two sessions, and a fast group (Fast), with two repetitions of the same five simulator exercises in a single training session. The primary endpoint was the mean efficiency score achieved in the final exercise. Results Fifty-two participants (22 males) were randomized, 26 in each group. Forty-eight per cent were between 30 and 50 years old and most of the participants were residents (44.2 %) or consultants (42.3 %), 13.5 % were students. The primary endpoint results showed a mean efficiency score of 48.2 ± 26.7 (Fast) vs. 52.3 ± 30.4 (Control) in the intention-to-treat analysis (p=0.527). The most significant improvement in efficiency and penalty scores was observed between the 1st and 4th repetitions in the control group. Participants over 50 years old and consultants performed worse than younger participants, students and resident doctors. Participants interested in robotic surgery outperformed those with little or no interest. Conclusions A training of 10–20 exercises on the dVSS with ascending levels is insufficient to succeed in complex simulation exercises but improves performance and motivation. These findings emphasize the need for tailored training programs and continuous skill development in robotic surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Emmanouilidis et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Robotic surgery novices (n=52). Fast simulator training protocol vs. Conventional simulator training protocol (four repetitions of five simulator exercises in two sessions) was evaluated on Mean efficiency score achieved in the final exercise (p=0.527). A fast simulator training protocol for robotic surgery novices yielded a similar mean efficiency score compared to a conventional protocol (48.2 vs 52.3; p=0.527).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: