Key result
Sacubitril/valsartan provides greatest heart failure benefits in patients with below-normal LVEF.
Why the study?
Heart failure classification based solely on LVEF is problematic, and additional clinical and biomarker criteria may improve phenotyping and help optimize the benefits of sacubitril/valsartan.
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve clinical outcomes and biomarkers in patients with heart failure across the LVEF spectrum?
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve clinical outcomes and biomarkers in patients with heart failure across the LVEF spectrum?
This review highlights that while LVEF is the standard for guiding heart failure therapy, additional clinical and biomarker characteristics may help optimize the use of sacubitril/valsartan across the heart failure spectrum.
Biomarkers may refine sacubitril/valsartan selection beyond LVEF in HF; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Of the various medical therapies for heart failure (HF), sacubitril/valsartan is a first-in-class angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor that combines sacubitril, a pro-drug that is further metabolized to the neprilysin inhibitor sacubitrilat, and the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker valsartan. Inhibition of neprilysin and blockade of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor with sacubitril/valsartan increases vasoactive peptide levels, increasing vasodilation, natriuresis, and diuresis. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is widely used to classify HF, to assist with clinical decision-making, for patient selection in HF clinical trials, and to optimize the benefits of sacubitril/valsartan in HF. However, as HF is a complex syndrome that occurs on a continuum of overlapping and changing phenotypes, patient classification based solely on LVEF becomes problematic. LVEF measurement can be imprecise, have low reproducibility, and often changes over time. LVEF may not accurately reflect inherent disease heterogeneity and complexity, and the addition of alternate criteria to LVEF may improve phenotyping of HF and help guide treatment choices. Sacubitril/valsartan may work, in part, by mechanisms that are not directly related to the LVEF. For example, this drug may exert antifibrotic and neurohumoral modulatory effects through inhibition or activation of several signaling pathways. In this review, we discuss markers of cardiac remodeling, fibrosis, systemic inflammation; activation of neurohormonal pathways, including the natriuretic system and the sympathetic nervous system; the presence of comorbidities; patient characteristics; hemodynamics; and HF signs and symptoms that may all be used to (1) better understand the mechanisms of action of sacubitril/valsartan and (2) help to identify subsets of patients who might benefit from treatment, regardless of LVEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Litwin et al. (2022) conducted a review in Heart failure. Sacubitril/valsartan was evaluated. Sacubitril/valsartan provides clinical benefits in heart failure that are most evident in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction below normal, though additional biomarkers may help optimize treatment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: