Key result
LBBAP narrows QRS versus RV pacing, with ~15 ms greater shortening in LBBB than RBBB.
Why the study?
Left bundle branch area pacing emerged as a promising physiological pacing alternative, but its characteristic electrocardiographic features across different patient subsets needed to be defined.
Does left bundle branch (LBB) area pacing improve paced QRS duration and morphology compared to RV apical pacing?
Observational (n=120)
Does left bundle branch (LBB) area pacing improve paced QRS duration and morphology compared to RV apical pacing?
Absolute Event Rate: 34.45% vs 19.78%
p-value: p=.004
Left bundle branch area pacing produces a narrower paced QRS complex compared to conventional RV apical pacing, particularly in patients with baseline LBBB, and typically presents with a qR or Qr pattern in lead V1.
LBB area pacing was associated with narrower QRS than RV apical pacing; leaves open effects on clinical outcomes in prospective trials.
Background Left bundle branch (LBB) area pacing emerged as a promising alternative to His bundle (HB) pacing in difficult cases of physiological pacing and failed cases of cardiac resynchronization. So, it is important to understand ECG features of LBB area pacing in various subsets of patients. Objective We wanted to find out different morphological patterns and characteristic ECG features of LBB area pacing. Method Medtronic 3830 pacing lead was used to pierce the interventricular septum 1‐2 cm distal towards the RV cavity to a previously placed electrophysiology catheter at distal HB region to reach the LBB area in the right anterior oblique (RAO) 30 degree projection. We observed paced QRS morphology in lead V1 and paced QRS duration. Results We have analyzed ECG features of 60 patients who had undergone LBB area pacing and 60 patients with RV apical pacing. LBB area pacing resulted in narrower‐paced QRS complex than conventional RV apical pacing. In patients with baseline LBBB QRS shortening from LBB area pacing was more in comparison to patients with RBBB (34.45 ± 8.07 ms vs 19.78 ± 10.24 ms, P value .004). Paced QRS morphological pattern in lead V1 was most commonly qR pattern followed by Qr pattern. Conclusions LBB area pacing results in narrower‐paced QRS duration than RV apical pacing. The morphological pattern is most commonly a qR or Qr pattern in lead V1. Patients with baseline RBBB showed lesser paced QRS shortening in comparison to patients with baseline LBBB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Das et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Patients requiring cardiac pacing (n=120). Left bundle branch (LBB) area pacing vs. Right ventricular (RV) apical pacing was evaluated on QRS shortening from LBB area pacing in patients with baseline LBBB vs RBBB (p=.004). Left bundle branch area pacing produced narrower QRS complexes than RV apical pacing, with greater QRS shortening in baseline LBBB versus RBBB (34.45 vs 19.78 ms; P=0.004).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: