In this recent study, thin films of pure tin oxide (SnO 2 ) denoted by TO and tin oxide doped with nickel (Ni) and zinc (Zn) at varying concentrations of 5 wt.%, 10 wt.%, and 15 wt.% were developed and characterized on ordinary glass substrates. The deposition of the films was conducted using the sol-gel technique (Dip-coating). These films are referred to as (Ni-Zn) co-doped tin oxide (NZTO) films that can be used in diverse applications such as gas and UV sensors. The effect of Ni/Zn co-doping on the structural, morphological, optical, and electrical properties of undoped SnO 2 was investigated by means of X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopy. The electrical properties were further examined using the quadruple method. XRD analysis revealed that all samples were polycrystalline with a rutile-type tetragonal crystal structure, predominantly oriented along the (110) plane, but changed to (100) and (200) orientations with high doping contents. The grain size values exhibited a decreasing tendency with increasing co-doping content. The SEM images indicated that the films possessed a porous surface and were made up of well-defined and homogenously dispersed spherical and polyhedron-shaped nanoparticles, which were influenced by doping with Ni and Zn. The FTIR study showed that all the films exhibit the Sn-O-Sn, Sn-O, Sn-OH, and H-O vibration peaks. The NZTO films enhanced the crystal structure and raised the optical energy gap from 4.03 eV for TO to 4.09 eV for NZTO. The thickness also increased from d = 353.44 nm for pure TO films to d = 448.43 nm for films doped with 15% NZTO. The highest transmittance value was observed to be 93% for TO within the visible range. Hall effect measurements indicated that TO exhibited n-type conductivity and p-type conductivity when doped with 5%, 10%, or 15% NZTO. This allows photodetectors based on TO to show great sensitivity to UV light.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Djebbari et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: