Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Current criticisms of the role of audit in society have painted a bleak picture about its use as a regulatory tool, highlighting negative consequences for democratic governance. This paper examines social accountability audits in light of these concerns. Two case studies of social certification systems are examined in detail: Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International (FLO) and Social Accountability International (SAI). These systems are evaluated using the lenses of accountability, ownership, trust, and reflexivity before concluding that social auditing processes, if done well and situated within stakeholder‐based institutions such as FLO and SAI, can aid democratic and legitimate governance processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sasha Courville (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: