This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Two ordinal consequences are drawn from the linear multiple-factor analysis model. First, the number R ( s, d ) of distinct ways in which s subjects can be ranked by linear functions of d factors is limited by the recursive expression R ( s, d ) = R ( s −, d )+( s −1) R ( s −, d −1). Second, every set S of d +2 subjects can be separated into two subsets S * and S − S * such that no linear function of d variables can rank all S * over all S − S *, and vice versa. When these results are applied to the hypothetical data of Thurstone's “box problem,” three independent parameters are found. Relations to Thurstone's suggestion for a non-correlational factor analysis are discussed.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joseph F. Bennett (1956) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: