Paul believes it is better for the Corinthian assembly not to marry (1 Cor 7:25–35). According to him, one disadvantage of marriage is that the married will experience “affliction in flesh” ( θλῖψις τῇ σαρκί , 7:28). I offer a contextual interpretation of Paul’s discussion on marriage through the lens of voluntary childlessness in contemporary China, which I argue can serve as a subversive form of resistance. During 2020–2022, some unborn children in China were lost due to the anti- Covid measures. In response, numerous Chinese netizens declared, “This will be our last generation,” promoting voluntary childlessness as a form of protest. I suggest that this trend can illuminate Paul’s preference for a marriage-free life. His advice for the Corinthian virgins to abstain from marriage – and presumably from procreation – can be interpreted as a subtle critique of the Roman marriage legislation promoting procreation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
M. H. Chen (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: