Key result
AI-enabled ECG algorithm achieves ~0.98 AUC for nearly all diagnostic codes compared to cardiologists.
Why the study?
Current automated computerized ECG interpretation algorithms have notoriously inconsistent performance, prompting the need for an AI-ECG algorithm capable of comprehensive 12-lead ECG interpretation comparable to practicing cardiologists.
Does an AI-ECG algorithm provide comprehensive 12-lead ECG interpretation with accuracy comparable to practicing cardiologists?
Observational (n=720,978)
No
Does an AI-ECG algorithm provide comprehensive 12-lead ECG interpretation with accuracy comparable to practicing cardiologists?
An AI-enabled ECG algorithm can interpret 12-lead ECGs across 66 diagnostic codes with high accuracy comparable to practicing cardiologists.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support AI-ECG as an interpretation aid in high-volume settings; leaves open prospective validation of clinical outcomes and workflow integration.
BackgroundAutomated computerized electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation algorithms are designed to enhance physician ECG interpretation, minimize medical error, and expedite clinical workflow. However, the performance of current computer algorithms is notoriously inconsistent. We aimed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence–enabled ECG (AI-ECG) algorithm capable of comprehensive 12-lead ECG interpretation with accuracy comparable to practicing cardiologists.MethodsWe developed an AI-ECG algorithm using a convolutional neural network as a multilabel classifier capable of assessing 66 discrete, structured diagnostic ECG codes using the cardiologist’s final annotation as the gold-standard interpretation. We included 2,499,522 ECGs from 720,978 patients ≥18 years of age with a standard 12-lead ECG obtained at the Mayo Clinic ECG laboratory between 1993 and 2017. The total sample was randomly divided into training (n = 1,749,654), validation (n = 249,951), and testing (n = 499,917) datasets with a similar distribution of codes. We compared the AI-ECG algorithm’s performance to the cardiologist’s interpretation in the testing dataset using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and precision recall (PR) curves.ResultsThe model performed well for various rhythm, conduction, ischemia, waveform morphology, and secondary diagnoses codes with an area under the ROC curve of ≥0.98 for 62 of the 66 codes. PR metrics were used to assess model performance accounting for category imbalance and demonstrated a sensitivity ≥95% for all codes.ConclusionsAn AI-ECG algorithm demonstrates high diagnostic performance in comparison to reference cardiologist interpretation of a standard 12-lead ECG. The use of AI-ECG reading tools may permit scalability as ECG acquisition becomes more ubiquitous. Automated computerized electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation algorithms are designed to enhance physician ECG interpretation, minimize medical error, and expedite clinical workflow. However, the performance of current computer algorithms is notoriously inconsistent. We aimed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence–enabled ECG (AI-ECG) algorithm capable of comprehensive 12-lead ECG interpretation with accuracy comparable to practicing cardiologists. We developed an AI-ECG algorithm using a convolutional neural network as a multilabel classifier capable of assessing 66 discrete, structured diagnostic ECG codes using the cardiologist’s final annotation as the gold-standard interpretation. We included 2,499,522 ECGs from 720,978 patients ≥18 years of age with a standard 12-lead ECG obtained at the Mayo Clinic ECG laboratory between 1993 and 2017. The total sample was randomly divided into training (n = 1,749,654), validation (n = 249,951), and testing (n = 499,917) datasets with a similar distribution of codes. We compared the AI-ECG algorithm’s performance to the cardiologist’s interpretation in the testing dataset using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and precision recall (PR) curves. The model performed well for various rhythm, conduction, ischemia, waveform morphology, and secondary diagnoses codes with an area under the ROC curve of ≥0.98 for 62 of the 66 codes. PR metrics were used to assess model performance accounting for category imbalance and demonstrated a sensitivity ≥95% for all codes. An AI-ECG algorithm demonstrates high diagnostic performance in comparison to reference cardiologist interpretation of a standard 12-lead ECG. The use of AI-ECG reading tools may permit scalability as ECG acquisition becomes more ubiquitous.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kashou et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Electrocardiogram interpretation (n=720,978). Artificial intelligence-enabled ECG (AI-ECG) algorithm vs. Cardiologist interpretation was evaluated on Diagnostic performance (Area under the ROC curve) for 66 discrete diagnostic ECG codes. An artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram algorithm demonstrated high diagnostic performance compared to cardiologist interpretation, achieving an AUC of ≥0.98 for 62 of 66 diagnostic codes.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: