This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
INTRODUCTION: Exercise has many benefits for people with Parkinson's disease (PD) and has been suggested to modify PD progression, but robust evidence supporting this is lacking. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review (PROSPERO registration: CRD42020169999) investigated whether exercise may have neuroplastic effects indicative of attenuating PD progression. METHODS: Six databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effect of exercise to control (no or sham exercise) or to another form of exercise, on indicators of PD progression (eg, brain-derived neurotrophic factor [BDNF], brain activation, "off" Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [UPDRS] scores). Trial quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed where at least 3 comparable trials reported the same outcome; remaining results were synthesized narratively. Narrative synthesis for the remaining outcomes suggested that compared to control, exercise may have neuroplastic effects. The exercise versus exercise comparisons were too heterogenous to enable pooling of results. DISCUSSION: This review provides limited evidence that exercise may have an attenuating effect on potential markers of PD progression. Further large RCTs are warranted to explore differential effects by exercise type, dose and PD stage, and should report on a core set of outcomes indicative of PD progression.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: