Key result
Aerobic exercise improves 1-minute heart rate recovery by ~6 bpm in adolescents with obesity.
Why the study?
Attenuated heart rate recovery after exercise predicts cardiovascular disease and mortality in adults, but the effects of different exercise modalities and their relationship with cardiometabolic risk were unexamined in adolescents with overweight or obesity.
Does aerobic, resistance, or combined exercise training improve heart rate recovery in adolescents with overweight or obesity?
RCT (n=147)
Randomized
No
Does aerobic, resistance, or combined exercise training improve heart rate recovery in adolescents with overweight or obesity?
Mean Difference: 6 (95% CI 1–11)
Absolute Event Rate: -31% vs -25%
p-value: p=0.02
Aerobic exercise training is superior to resistance or combined training for improving heart rate recovery in adolescents with overweight or obesity, offering a strategy to improve parasympathetic function and potentially lower cardiometabolic risk.
Aerobic training may improve autonomic function in overweight adolescents; leaves open effects on cardiometabolic outcomes and optimal modality.
OBJECTIVE: Attenuated heart rate recovery (HRR) immediately after exercise is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease and mortality in adults. We examined the effects of aerobic exercise (AE), resistance exercise (RE), and combined AE and RE on HRR, and the relationship of HRR with body composition and metabolic risk factors in adolescents with overweight or obesity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We included 147 adolescents (BMI ≥ 85th percentile, 12-18 years) who participated in exercise intervention studies (3-6 months), and had a complete data set including VO2peak, body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and cardiometabolic risk factors before and after the interventions. HRR was calculated as the difference between peak HR during the maximal treadmill test and HR at 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-min after the cessation of the test. RESULTS: After interventions, a faster HRR at 2-5 min was observed following AE (17.3-25.6% change, P < 0.0001), RE (7.1-10.9%, P < 0.05), and combined AE and RE (10.7-12.0%, P < 0.05) compared to pre-intervention. Compared to controls, AE (14.0-24.0%, P < 0.05) was the only exercise group to exhibit a significantly faster HRR at 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-min after the exercise intervention. Collapsed across exercise groups, improvements in 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-min HRR are independently associated (P < 0.05) with increases in VO2peak. Changes in HRR were not associated with the changes in % body fat or metabolic risk factors. CONCLUSION: AE training is more beneficial than RE or combined AE and RE training for improving HRR in adolescents with overweight or obesity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pooni et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Overweight or Obesity (n=147). Aerobic exercise (AE) vs. Non-exercise control was evaluated on 1-minute heart rate recovery (HRR) post-intervention (MD 6 bpm, 95% CI 1-11, p=0.02). Aerobic exercise training for 3 to 6 months significantly improved 1-minute heart rate recovery by 24% (mean difference 6 bpm) compared to a non-exercise control in adolescents with overweight or obesity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: