This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Lumped-element inductors are an integral component in the circuit QED toolbox. However, it is challenging to build inductors that are simultaneously compact, linear, and low-loss with standard approaches that either rely on the geometric inductance of superconducting thin films or on the kinetic inductance of Josephson-junction arrays. In this work, we overcome this challenge by utilizing the high kinetic inductance offered by superconducting granular aluminum (grAl). We demonstrate lumped-element inductors with a few nH of inductance that are up to <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mn>100</a:mn></a:math> times shorter than inductors built from pure aluminum (Al). To characterize the properties of these linear inductors, we first report on the performance of lumped-element resonators built entirely out of grAl with sheet inductances varying from <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mn>30</c:mn></c:math>–<e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mn>320</e:mn></e:math> pH/sq and self-Kerr nonlinearities of <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:mn>0.2</g:mn></g:math>–<i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:mn>20</i:mn><i:mspace width="0.2em"/><i:mrow><i:mi>Hz</i:mi><i:mo>/</i:mo><i:mi>photon</i:mi></i:mrow></i:math>. Further, we demonstrate integration of these grAl inductors into hybrid resonators with <l:math xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><l:mi>Al</l:mi></l:math> or tantalum (<n:math xmlns:n="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><n:mi>Ta</n:mi></n:math>) capacitor electrodes without increasing total internal losses. Interestingly, the measured internal quality factors systematically decrease with increasing room-temperature resistivity of the grAl film for all devices, indicating a trade-off between compactness and internal loss. For our lowest resistivity grAl films, we measure quality factors reaching <p:math xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><p:mn>3.5</p:mn><p:mo>×</p:mo><p:msup><p:mn>10</p:mn><p:mn>6</p:mn></p:msup></p:math> for the all-grAl devices and <r:math xmlns:r="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><r:mn>4.5</r:mn><r:mo>×</r:mo><r:msup><r:mn>10</r:mn><r:mn>6</r:mn></r:msup></r:math> for the hybrid grAl/<t:math xmlns:t="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><t:mi>Ta</t:mi></t:math> devices, similar to state-of-the-art quantum circuits. Our loss analysis suggests that the surface-loss factor of grAl is similar to that of pure <v:math xmlns:v="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><v:mi>Al</v:mi></v:math> for our lowest resistivity films, while the increasing losses with resistivity could be explained by increasing inductor loss in the grAl film.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gupta et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: