The paper shows the benefit of registration tools in the quantitative analysis of tomography data. For this purpose three-dimensional datasets, i.e. target design in rapid prototyping, hard X-ray tomography, and magnetic resonance tomography, were registered with rigid, affine and non-rigid algorithms. Using rigid registration, we aligned individual tomograms to obtain one three-dimensional dataset per specimen, compared human teeth to determine abrasion, and optimized the acquisition parameters in clinical computed tomography. Affine registration was used to determine the sintering-induced shrinkage of hydroxyapatite scaffolds. Using non-rigid registration, we gained insight into tumor morphology imaged by different modes of micro computed tomography. In addition, the fixation-induced shrinkage of tumor tissue and the local deformation of brain tissues as well as the shape changes in nickel titanium alloys were quantitatively determined. Three-dimensional registration is, therefore, a powerful means to count back any influence on morphology of tissues and to quantitatively compare data of different tomography modalities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Müller et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: