Key result
Mobile health-guided home walking undergoes feasibility testing against standard cardiac rehab after recent MI.
Why the study?
Cardiac rehabilitation uptake remains low in the UK (52%), and mHealth technologies providing biometric data may bridge the gap between supervised exercise and physical activity advice to support long-term active lifestyles.
Does mHealth-supported exercise counseling added to standard cardiac rehabilitation improve feasibility and uptake in patients with recent myocardial infarction?
RCT
assessor blinded
parallel group
Does mHealth-supported exercise counseling added to standard cardiac rehabilitation improve feasibility and uptake in patients with recent myocardial infarction?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This protocol describes a feasibility trial evaluating mHealth-supported exercise counseling to improve cardiac rehabilitation uptake in patients with recent myocardial infarction.
INTRODUCTION: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) can reduce cardiovascular mortality and improve health-related quality of life. In the United Kingdom, patient uptake of CR remains low (52%), falling well short of the target in the 2019 National Health Service long-term plan (85%). Mobile health (mHealth) technologies, offering biometric data to patients and healthcare professionals, may bridge the gap between supervised exercise and physical activity advice, enabling patients to engage in regular long-term physically active lifestyles. This randomised controlled trial (RCT) will evaluate the feasibility of mHealth technology when incorporated into a structured home-based walking intervention, in people with recent myocardial infarction. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a feasibility, assessor blinded, parallel group RCT. Participants will be allocated to either CR standard care (control group) or CR standard care+mHealth supported exercise counselling (mHealth intervention group). Feasibility outcomes will include the number of patients approached, screened and eligible; the percentage of patients who decline CR (including reasons for declining), agree to CR and consent to being part of the study; the percentage of patients who enrol in standard CR and reasons for drop out; and the percentage of participants who complete clinical, physical and psychosocial outcomes to identify a suitable primary outcome for a future definitive trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial was approved in the UK by the Northwest-Greater Manchester East Research Ethics Committee (22/NW/0301) and is being conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT05774587.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crozier et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in recent myocardial infarction. CR standard care + mHealth supported exercise counselling vs. CR standard care was evaluated on Feasibility outcomes including recruitment, retention, and completion rates of clinical, physical, and psychosocial outcomes. Mobile health technology incorporated into a structured home-based walking intervention will be evaluated for feasibility against standard cardiac rehabilitation in patients with recent myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: