Key result
Distance, transportation, and cost rank as the top barriers to hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation in CHD.
Why the study?
Cardiac rehabilitation utilization is low worldwide, and barriers to hospital-based phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation in China have not been well identified.
Cross-Sectional (n=160)
No
Distance, transportation, and cost are the primary logistical barriers to hospital-based phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease patients in China, highlighting the need for alternative delivery models like home-based or mobile health programs.
May constrain hospital CR access in China; hypothesis-generating for home-based alternatives, needing prospective validation.
Background Coronary heart disease (CHD) has become a leading cause of morbidity and premature death worldwide. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) was proved to have substantial benefits for patients with CHD. The CR was divided into three phases. Phase 2 is the important part of CR which involves hospital-based structured and closely monitored exercises and activities. However, CR utilization is low worldwide. The barriers to hospital-based phase 2 CR in China have not been well identified. Aims To investigate barriers to hospital-based phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation among coronary heart disease patients in China and to explore the reasons. Methods This study employed an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. The study was conducted in a university hospital in China from July 2021 to December 2021. Quantitative data was collected through the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barrier Scale. Qualitative data was collected through unstructured face-to-face interviews. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and inductive qualitative content analysis. Results One hundred and sixty patients completed the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barrier Scale and 17 patients participated in unstructured face-to-face interviews. The main barriers identified were distance (3.29 ± 1.565), transportation (2.99 ± 1.503), cost (2.76 ± 1.425), doing exercise at home (2.69 ± 1.509) and time constraints (2.48 ± 1.496). Six themes were identified; logistical factors, social support, misunderstanding of cardiac rehabilitation, program and health system-level factors, impression of CR team and psychological distress. The first four themes confirmed the quantitative results and provide a deeper explanation for the quantitative results. The last two themes were new information that emerged in the qualitative phase. Conclusion This study provides a better understanding of the barriers to hospital-based phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation among coronary heart disease patients in the Chinese context during the Covid-19 pandemic. Innovative programs such as home-based CR, mobile health, and hybrid programs might be considered to overcome some of these barriers. In addition, psychosocial intervention should be included in these programs to mitigate some of the barriers associated with the impression of CR team and psychological distress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xie et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary heart disease (n=160). Hospital-based phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation was evaluated on Barriers to cardiac rehabilitation (Cardiac Rehabilitation Barrier Scale scores). Distance (score 3.29), transportation (2.99), and cost (2.76) were identified as the most significant barriers to hospital-based phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation among patients with coronary heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: